From owner-cvs-all Mon Mar 10 4:40:32 2003 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9087537B401; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 04:40:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4AD243F3F; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 04:40:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h2ACeTIo042527; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:40:29 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) with UUCP id h2ACeTen042526; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:40:29 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.org (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h2ACcaIg077406; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:38:37 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200303101238.h2ACcaIg077406@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: "Tim J. Robbins" Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: chat@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/i386/string Makefile.inc wcscmp.S In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 10 Mar 2003 02:54:36 PST." <200303101054.h2AAsaKu089414@repoman.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:38:36 +0000 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Tim J. Robbins" writes: > tjr 2003/03/10 02:54:36 PST > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > lib/libc/i386/string Makefile.inc > Added files: > lib/libc/i386/string wcscmp.S > Log: > MFp4: Pentium-optimised implementation of wcscmp(). Performs significantly > better than the code generated by gcc in many cases. is this the sort of thing that a compiler _in_theory_ could/should do well, or is this the kind of assembler code that only a human could be expected to come up with? If the former, then I may be interested in spending some years reading up on compiler/optimisation technology. I'm not too charmed with MD code; the more that could be done by the compiler, the more I like it. :-) M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message