From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Aug 7 11:37:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE0737B400 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 11:37:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA6643E6E for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 11:37:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk ([IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g77IbpFo002554; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 19:37:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost) by happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g77IbjnD002553; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 19:37:45 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 19:37:45 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: adrian kok Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nat and firewall Message-ID: <20020807183745.GA2448@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> References: <20020807175702.58713.qmail@web21203.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020807175702.58713.qmail@web21203.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 01:57:02AM +0800, adrian kok wrote: > Is it possible to running firewall but not nat? > I read about nat in handbook. It looks like that > all are running together Sure, that works just fine. NAT is not compulsory. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way Tel: +44 1628 476614 Marlow Fax: +44 0870 0522645 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message