Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:42:58 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Ports Mailing List <ports@freebsd.org>, perl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl symlinks question Message-ID: <CAF6rxgkZ-ghrV9moAj7uR%2BOTw6FYgDniPD4HPY52TRWNWz%2BrfQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F0B41B2.9020506@yandex.ru> References: <4F0B36BD.8070202@yandex.ru> <CADLo839GMbxbkL=j7XjEGfgveJkDHOmkD5P0nyW3kOjaJQfi2Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgn9n-m5CRV-wso%2BNWSmMe5yZ=AaUR4R=KkiPxZH%2Bee5ng@mail.gmail.com> <4F0B41B2.9020506@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> wrote:
> Eitan Adler wrote on 09.01.2012 23:32:
>
>> 2012/1/9 Chris Rees<crees@freebsd.org>:
>>>
>>> 1. Fix devel/automake too (by replacing /usr/bin/perl with ${PERL})
>>>>
>>>> 2. Create symlinks unconditionally in perl port and drop USE_PERL option
>>
>>
>> /usr/bin is in LOCALBASE which may be read only.
>
>
> Ok, but if so most part of ports tree will not build on such systems,
> because automake tools (aclocal in particular) calling /usr/bin/perl.
The option should remain on by default due to the majority use case,
but elimination the option is a bad idea. Users should not have to
hack ports to use a readonly LOCALBASE.
--
Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgkZ-ghrV9moAj7uR%2BOTw6FYgDniPD4HPY52TRWNWz%2BrfQ>