From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 2 8:31:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3FC37B8FE for ; Tue, 2 May 2000 08:31:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.freebsd.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA12417; Tue, 2 May 2000 17:31:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Forrest Aldrich Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 02 May 2000 10:40:34 EDT." <20000502104034.G3818@drama.navipath.com> Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 17:31:21 +0200 Message-ID: <12415.957281481@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000502104034.G3818@drama.navipath.com>, Forrest Aldrich writes: >I've been curious about this. Would someone clarify what in this >license prevents FreeBSD from including it, at some level? People wouldn't be able to use FreeBSD without giving away their source. /etc/passwd is stored in a db file for instance. Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message