From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec  1 22:34:04 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B511116A403
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Fri,  1 Dec 2006 22:34:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org)
Received: from noop.in-addr.com (noop.in-addr.com [208.58.23.51])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884D843CA2
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Fri,  1 Dec 2006 22:33:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org)
Received: from gjp by noop.in-addr.com with local (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD))
	id 1GqGx3-000ERs-Vb
	for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:33:49 -0500
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 17:33:49 -0500
From: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20061201223349.GB53372@in-addr.com>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
References: <3931.1164968488@critter.freebsd.dk>
	<200612011839.kB1IdFZO067817@apollo.backplane.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200612011839.kB1IdFZO067817@apollo.backplane.com>
Subject: Re: a proposed callout API
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 22:34:04 -0000

On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:39:15AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :So,  like, why don't you work on that, instead of annoying us with your
> :long lectures about how "The World Shall Be Ordered According To Me" ?
> :
> :Poul-Henning
> 
>     Because, fortunately, the lives of DragonFly developers aren't governed
>     by big-dick contests from people who clearly have no clue what DragonFly
>     is all about.

Can we please lose the attitudes and get on with the discussion?  This
is nothing to do with the original discussion and is no longer constructive.

I'm not singling Matt out by following up to his e-mail directly.  But
this is now way off topic and needs to be put back ON topic.

Thank you