From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 18:48:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262A216A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:48:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu (mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.231.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921E343D1F for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:48:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mitch@ccmr.cornell.edu) Received: from saruman.ccmr.cornell.edu (saruman.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.249.196])i092m03R002732; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:48:00 -0500 Received: from localhost (mitch@localhost)i092lx4w029954; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:48:00 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: saruman.ccmr.cornell.edu: mitch owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:47:59 -0500 (EST) From: Mitch Collinsworth To: Adam McLaurin In-Reply-To: <20040108162416.13c13a53.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> Message-ID: References: <20040107151544.6bbab003.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> <1073530943.77647.90.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <20040108162416.13c13a53.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: q_dolan@yahoo.com.au Subject: Re: Intermittent problems with LAN transfer speeds X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 02:48:03 -0000 On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Adam McLaurin wrote: > First, both speed & duplex are set manualyl at both ends. In fact, I did > this more than a year ago as a recommendation to solve this particular > problem we're discussing now. In other words, the problem existed before > I manually set speed/duplex, and afterwards. When you say "both ends" do you mean computer and network switch? Or do you mean computer A and computer B? Is the switch managed or unmanaged? You can't set full duplex on an unmanaged switch, it is always in auto. If you have an unmanaged switch you MUST set the computers to auto or to half. Setting them to full will most definitely cause problems. The auto-negotiation specification says a port set to auto must choose half if the other end is not set to auto. This is an extremely common misunderstanding. -Mitch