From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 21:39:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E44516A41F for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:39:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [216.243.161.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C339E43D48 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:39:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (snipe.secure-computing.net [216.243.161.77]) (authenticated bits=0) by grog.secure-computing.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9SLdXuD051783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:39:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=grog; d=secure-computing.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc: content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:x-spam-status:x-spam-checker-version; b=LXrgR05i+2E4oQeTQ39kxwBIa63da3FmsXRs0sIeAPBVBqzrDJpngKM3RW8+w7SnR HDRMs8opIC0CCYCpU5j+w== In-Reply-To: References: <200510271904.17908.ringworm01@gmail.com> <200510280640.04025.ringworm01@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <6FB767AE-D4D7-4C38-90C0-726D48AF5654@secure-computing.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric F Crist Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:39:04 -0500 To: John DeStefano X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on grog.secure-computing.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade stale dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:39:27 -0000 > status report finished > ====================================================================== > == > percentDone-=>0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=>1 / > TOTAL_outOfDatePortsDb-=>1 ) ) > upgrade 0.3.0_0 info: ignoring apache-2.0.48, reason: failed during > (2) make > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > update of ports collection complete with either some errors, ignored > ports or both > > > Unfortunately, this is the most crucial of all, and ironically the one > about which I've been asking since the beginning. As I mentioned > earlier, upgrading this port bails consistently with a C callout to > PEM_F_DEF_CALLBACK. I'd really like to get this port updated, not > only to finally complete this insane goose chase of updating, but > because I know that apache-2.0.48 is chock full of vulerabilities. > > > cd /usr/ports/www/apache20 && make deinstall && make clean && make reinstall See what happens. ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks http://www.secure-computing.net