Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:29:18 +0200 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> To: Bernard Spil <brnrd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r438307 - in head: . security/libressl Message-ID: <shld-em2p-wny@FreeBSD.org> References: <201704111901.v3BJ1Ykc091596@repo.freebsd.org> <CAOc73CBaDscx964%2Bmph0F%2Bw_XB3xp-2P9yA5CqbQ6Vx4xJZEuQ@mail.gmail.com> <3d3a826a-45d1-dff8-e913-8111e71e8b7a@mat.cc> <ab0562213bd70da7a90e659d95666a5e@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bernard Spil <brnrd@FreeBSD.org> writes: >>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/438307 >>> >>> Log: >>> security/libressl: Update to 2.5.3 [...] >>> I thought the normal practice was for the commit to also bump the >>> PORTREVISION for all ports that depend on the one that has changed, to >>> ensure users of portmaster and portupgrade automatically rebuild all >>> dependent ports? >> >> It is not always feasible to do so, libressl is not the default, and >> there are *many* ports that depends on it through USES=ssl. > > There are currently no ports that have a runtime dependency on LibreSSL. > Both security/acme-client as well as net/openntpd use statically > linked libtls. If you don't bump PORTREVISION of static library consumers how else package-only users would pick up fixes that are part of the update? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213691#c4
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?shld-em2p-wny>