From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Dec 22 17:45:00 1994 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id RAA04753 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 22 Dec 1994 17:45:00 -0800 Received: from clark.net (dboynton@clark.net [168.143.0.7]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA04747 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 1994 01:44:54 GMT Received: (dboynton@localhost) by clark.net (8.6.9/8.6.5) id UAA05323; Thu, 22 Dec 1994 20:44:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 20:44:23 -0500 From: Dave Boynton Message-Id: <199412230144.UAA05323@clark.net> To: hlew@genome.Stanford.EDU Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: internal modem on com4 Content-Length: 1742 Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > From hlew@genome.stanford.edu Thu Dec 22 02:32 EST 1994 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 1994 23:22:01 +0000 > From: Howard Lew > Subject: Re: internal modem on com4 > To: Dave Boynton > cc: questions@freebsd.org > > On Tue, 20 Dec 1994, Dave Boynton wrote: > > > > I read the Slip faq but I'm still at a loss on setting it up > > with my internal modem, which is on com4 (0x2e8, irg 3). I've > > rebuilt the kernel with com4 having those values, and the port > > is recognized on boot-up, but which /dev/tty* do I use for > > kermit and/or slip or ppp? I've tried /dev/tty0-4 but most say > > "not configured" or "file not found", etc. > > > > I thought it would be easier to flip a jumper to another IRQ (7 I > think)... But anyway, do you have a device called /dev/cua03 using your > setup? Take a look in /dev. > I probably would've taken less time, even with it being an internal modem. Someone should look a the kernel makefile - I shouldn't have to recompile every object file whenever some minor change is made to the configuration. Commercial Unix's don't distribute kernel source, and they just as many options. > From my experiences, if not: > > cd /dev > sh MAKEDEV cua03 > > Then instead of choosing /dev/tty* use /dev/cua03 in your > communications program (I use minicom), and that should correspond > to com4 and all should be well. > > I hope this helps. > Thanks; it did. Apparently, the Slip FAQ needs updating - I recall it saying in one place to use /dev/tty01, and using /dev/cua01 as an example in another. And I would've thought the distributed configuration would've made all four sio devices, since the kernel had them in the configuration. Dave Boynton