From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 1 08:04:24 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D6216A417; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFAB813C45A; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:04:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDBC2089; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:47:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF4E2085; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:47:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2B3A18447A; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:47:19 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Hajimu UMEMOTO References: <46AA0491.5000203@gahr.ch> <46ADAF5B.6050602@gahr.ch> <20070730180355.GA7355@rot26.obsecurity.org> <46AE58B5.3080506@gahr.ch> <46AECE8C.8000500@gahr.ch> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:47:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Hajimu UMEMOTO's message of "Tue\, 31 Jul 2007 15\:43\:15 +0900") Message-ID: <86hcnjn1bs.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Pietro Cerutti Subject: Re: [patch] enhance powerd(8) to handle max temperature X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:04:24 -0000 Hajimu UMEMOTO writes: > I cannot see _TC1, _TC2 nor _TSP in your `acpidump -dt' output. > Further, there is no _PSV definition in anywhere, in the first place. > It seems to me that your ACPI BIOS doesn't support passive cooling at > all. Going off on a tangent, I too have several motherboards (965P-based) which do not define any ACPI thermal zones, which leads me to wonder: what is the preferred way to access thermal data these days? IPMI? Do we have IPMI support in base or ports? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no