Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:56:29 +0600 From: "Eugene M. Zheganin" <emz@norma.perm.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE + bge0 == watchdog timeout Message-ID: <51372EED.7080803@norma.perm.ru> In-Reply-To: <20130306062658.GC1483@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <F02BE044-1C4F-43EB-8091-BC62362C2E5F@sd63.bc.ca> <D557DE29-DED8-4B89-9D1C-171FC17D435E@hub.org> <201302241106.42477.vegeta@tuxpowered.net> <20130225082042.GB1426@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <512CF97B.8030805@norma.perm.ru> <20130227020123.GA3581@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <512DE968.4020409@quip.cz> <20130228053558.GA1474@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <5136D89D.4000902@norma.perm.ru> <20130306062658.GC1483@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi. On 06.03.2013 12:26, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > If you were using latest stable/8, the result would be same on > CURRENT. > How frequently do you see the watchdog timeouts? Is there way to > reproduce it? > Would you show me the output of dmesg (bge(4) and brgphy(4) only) > and "pciconf -lcbv"? I just thought. I have never saw a watchdog timeout on an i386. Like, never (on same system x3250 and same controllers - these servers are from the same bunch). However all of my i386 machines run less recent versions of FreeBSD. Does this make sense ? I mean amd64 and related stuff. Thanks Eugene.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51372EED.7080803>