From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 26 17:46:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6A616A402; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:46:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CB313C483; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:46:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:45:59 -0500 id 00056421.45BA3E57.00009821 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:45:59 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <20070126124559.57547ff3.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20070126174045.GB38317@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <45C70401CEDC85AA7A692962@ganymede.hub.org> <20070126085943.57633f7b.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <20070126174045.GB38317@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.7; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Opinions Wanted] Dell PowerEdge 2950 Servers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:46:00 -0000 In response to Jerry McAllister : > On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 08:59:43AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > > In response to "Marc G. Fournier" : > > > > ... > > > > We have 4 1950s and 3 2950s in use around here. Only one is actually in > > production so far, the rest are still being configured, etc. > > > > We're mostly happy with them. The following is a list of caveats: > > > > *) The version 5 DRAC is nicer than the version 4, _except_ that you have > > to use a Windows client to connect to it. May not be an issue for you, > > but all our admins here use FreeBSD on their workstations :( > > Have you tried 'rdesktop' in the portst at /usr/ports/net/rdesktop > or /usr/ports/net/xrdesktop? > > I don't know if it would apply to this, but it works for me in > some other situations or similar MS annoyance. The Dell DRAC is not based on the RDP protocol. It uses some kind of Dell-specific communication that seems to mimic VNC -- but standard VNC clients don't work with it. Version 4 DRAC provided a java client that worked fine on just about any OS we use, but the DRAC 5 requires some ActiveX component and doesn't run on non-MS systems. Luckily, there's qemu, but it's still not a perfect match. Qemu tends to be s l o w. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc.