From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jun 25 12:20:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2853737B7AB for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 12:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g5PJK4u81332; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 12:20:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 12:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200206251920.g5PJK4u81332@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Paul Marquis Subject: Re: ports/39826: update-port: devel/stlport (compile BROKEN on latest 4-STABLE) Reply-To: Paul Marquis Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/39826; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Paul Marquis To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, lehmann@ans-netz.de Cc: Subject: Re: ports/39826: update-port: devel/stlport (compile BROKEN on latest 4-STABLE) Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:16:11 -0400 This is failing while doing a make test, which was added to the port=20 build without consulting me to demonstrate a bug in gcc. The main library is built with g++, while the test program is built=20 with c++. Can you verify that they're both pointing to the same=20 executable (which g++, which c++)? Do you have any aliases that=20 might conflict? The path to the new header file looks strange. I get=20 /usr/include/g++/new, not /usr/include/g++/g++/new. Do you have=20 multiple compilers installed? --=20 Paul Marquis pmarquis@pobox.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message