From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Jan 30 16:55:15 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2FDED588A; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:55:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D669760B1; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:55:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 1D7BC12C2C; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:55:15 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Alan Somers Cc: Mathieu Arnold , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r460414 - head/sysutils/vm-bhyve Message-ID: <20180130165515.GA73108@FreeBSD.org> References: <201801301620.w0UGKfQn061115@repo.freebsd.org> <20180130163232.klnyxym7efqq6l5k@ogg.in.absolight.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:55:15 -0000 On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:49:13AM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > I thought that PORTREVISION should only be bumped when there is a change > to the files that a port installs? Imagine a situation: user has pre-r460414 version installed, which is, as you say, can be dysfunctional. How would you force the user to upgrade the package and thus have them `security/ca_root_nss' installed? ./danfe P.S. It really helps not to memorize any rules behind PORTREVISION bump but just think if it should be bumped in each particular case. > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 04:20:41PM +0000, Alan Somers wrote: > > > Log: > > > sysutils/vm-bhyve: add security/ca_root_nss as a RUN_DEPENDS > > > > You also need to bump PORTREVISION.