From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed May  9  8: 6:49 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net (hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.22])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA91237B423
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed,  9 May 2001 08:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from adsharma@sharmas.dhs.org)
Received: from sharmas.dhs.org (cpe-66-1-147-119.ca.sprintbbd.net [66.1.147.119])
	by hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA29057
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 9 May 2001 08:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from adsharma@localhost)
	by sharmas.dhs.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA02819
	for hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 9 May 2001 08:02:09 -0700
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 08:02:08 -0700
From: Arun Sharma <arun@sharmas.dhs.org>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD ld.so performance ?
Message-ID: <20010509080208.A2814@sharmas.dhs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

http://www.suse.de/~bastian/Export/linking.txt

Has anyone done a comparative study ?

	-Arun

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message