From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 15 11:23:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C843E16A4CE for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:23:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.devrandom.org.uk (mail.devrandom.org.uk [84.92.10.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561A343D2F for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:23:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from howells@kde.org) Received: from localhost (frodo [192.168.1.8]) by mail.devrandom.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679FA256157 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:23:21 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.devrandom.org.uk ([192.168.1.8]) by localhost (frodo.devrandom.org.uk [192.168.1.8]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61777-08 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:23:16 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.176] (unknown [192.168.1.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.devrandom.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9124D2560D7 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:23:16 +0100 (BST) From: Chris Howells Organization: K Desktop Environment To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:23:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <416EB6B1.6060405@ng.fadesa.es> <416F849F.8020508@solid-state-logic.com> <416F90E6.10108@ng.fadesa.es> In-Reply-To: <416F90E6.10108@ng.fadesa.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart73190050.ysm7q1Hk3X"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410151223.33355.howells@kde.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at devrandom.org.uk Subject: Re: FreeBSD and poor ata performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:23:39 -0000 --nextPart73190050.ysm7q1Hk3X Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 15 October 2004 09:57, fandino wrote: > I'm out of ideas, It doesn't matter if I use other PC or hard disks, > performance > sucks compared to Linux :-( OK, so you came to conclusion that "performance sucks" based on the the=20 theoretical throughput figures using dd and /dev/zero? Why don't you try measuring real world performace, with real files, not=20 somethig which is more than likely completely meaningless when two operatin= g=20 systems cache file system operations in different ways. =2D-=20 Cheers, Chris Howells -- chris@chrishowells.co.uk, howells@kde.org Web: http://chrishowells.co.uk, PGP ID: 0x33795A2C KDE/Qt/C++/PHP Developer: http://www.kde.org --nextPart73190050.ysm7q1Hk3X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBb7M1F8Iu1zN5WiwRArjcAJ9Ey2hSNeIYjQX92O6FKHfiwMDJ5wCcDO1L z0xgVWItfht/iAvtjtRbGRk= =QGzs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart73190050.ysm7q1Hk3X--