From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 21 15:28:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8992F1065676 for ; Thu, 21 May 2009 15:28:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from louie@transsys.com) Received: from ringworld.transsys.com (ringworld.transsys.com [144.202.0.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEB68FC29 for ; Thu, 21 May 2009 15:28:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from louie@transsys.com) Received: from PM-G5.transsys.com (c-69-141-150-106.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [69.141.150.106]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: louie) by ringworld.transsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED505C4C; Thu, 21 May 2009 11:28:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <6F2AF4C4-B6DC-4CA0-83DA-BFE9CA1AD1A9@transsys.com> From: Louis Mamakos To: Freddie Cash In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 11:28:19 -0400 References: <3c1674c90905201459k19776d53n309b2abeab0f8d0a@mail.gmail.com> <200905202209.n4KM9Bcg094853@lava.sentex.ca> <3c1674c90905201541n65f997e6jaa20d93bf566fb98@mail.gmail.com> <68BDAD74-021A-4169-B003-21A2BCF2AD5C@transsys.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS MFC heads up X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 15:28:21 -0000 On May 21, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Louis Mamakos > wrote: >> FYI, I just did an upgrade of my RELENG_7 machine with the new ZFS >> merged >> in, and it seems to have gone mostly trouble-free. I noticed one >> weirdness >> that could be confusion on my part - I'm no longer seeing snapshots >> when I >> do 'zfs list'. There's a UI change in the zfs command, and to see >> snapshots, you have to explicitly ask for them: > > It's a known change made to the zfs tool somewhere around v11 or so. > It's documented in all the Solaris notes about ZFS. You have to > explicitily list the type of dataset(s) you want to list with "zfs > list". By default, it only shows filesystems. You even have to use > -t if you want to list volumes. > > Reading up on the Solaris docs for ZFS is quite enlightening. :) We might want to update the zfs(1) man page in the examples for the 'list' subcommand. I think I actually like the new behavior, it was just a little unnerving at first to have the snapshots be missing after the MFC. louie