From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct 16 15:18:44 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F3016A4CE
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 16 Oct 2004 15:18:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from caine.easynet.fr (smarthost150.mail.easynet.fr [212.180.1.150])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA2B43D1D
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 16 Oct 2004 15:18:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org)
Received: from [212.180.127.72] (helo=tatooine.tataz.chchile.org)
	by caine.easynet.fr with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CIqKQ-0006Eo-7V; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:18:42 +0200
Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id BC18D40B0; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:18:43 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:18:43 +0200
From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>
To: Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de>
Message-ID: <20041016151842.GH729@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
References: <34cb7c8404101507297970e8dc@mail.gmail.com>
	<200410151436.i9FEak3C008009@lurza.secnetix.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200410151436.i9FEak3C008009@lurza.secnetix.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Broken-Reverse-DNS: no host name found for IP address 212.180.127.72
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NFS + VM question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 15:18:45 -0000

> It really sounds like nullfs would be the solution for me,
> but unfortunately, I can't use it because of the known pro-
> blems of nullfs in FreeBSD 4-stable (which is the branch
> that I'm using).

It would definitely be the solution, but there are still problems with it.
Mark Liminon made a call for PR concerning nullfs a few month ago.
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1874558+0+archive/2004/freebsd-current/20040718.freebsd-current

AFAIK, none of the above problems has been solved, but I may be wrong.

-- 
Jeremie Le Hen
jeremie@le-hen.org