From owner-soc-status@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 26 17:13:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: soc-status@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAB2106566B for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:13:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@kovesdan.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068AB8FC12 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0087814E5937 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:13:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.mypc.hu Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id XfC-n2mKcGSW for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:13:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [193.137.158.216] (unknown [193.137.158.216]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D974A14E5850 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:13:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E0768CA.3040100@kovesdan.org> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:13:46 +0100 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; pt-PT; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: soc-status@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: regex status report #5 X-BeenThere: soc-status@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Summer of Code Status Reports and Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:13:48 -0000 Hi, this week I sent an early test patch to current@ to evaluate whether the performance and the POSIX-compliance are satisfying. Of course, I did my own tests but it's important to let the public check it. Let's see if I got some response. Apart from this, I progressed with the optimization. Now I see more clearly how I can integrate my ideas into TRE. As a first step, I grabbed BSD grep's optimization but it was very specific to grep so I made it very general to handle hopefully all the necessary cases. I also adopted it to TRE's convention so that I have a better chance to get it accepted upstream. For now, I was just thinking and coding but made no tests and that's why I haven't checked this code in because I want to keep my branch stable. It will happen soon, though. In general, I'm a bit behind the schedule at the moment but I think now I'm on the good track at least with this part. Gabor