From nobody Thu Apr 30 08:20:47 2026 X-Original-To: pkgbase@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4g5nDh6nVVz6bKmY for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:20:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@cmplx.uk) Received: from cmplx.uk (cmplx.uk [185.139.32.190]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "cmplx.uk", Issuer "cmplx.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4g5nDh3y2Lz3xTk for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:20:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@cmplx.uk) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from cmplx.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cmplx.uk (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 63U8KmOs026205 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:20:49 GMT (envelope-from lists@cmplx.uk) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cmplx.uk; s=default; t=1777537249; bh=iHio1FFT2gy2vskJiHxhcj9WyuFxzxJEyq/6ncnrCSA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=lzxmoUPfxe8VMqQ5G4bylnPWKGFd0C/QR+FZFXgiPGIId51WqCMVecXrF0hnZFuy3 lGu12brzdQ3UnHFDxWgPAYISrhEsm4GIiIMNW/a5l7/+Qmwt0gL+WPZtM+2wATI8nE pNcIkkjWQQTv76FTNU+ysnLlb2qPTNhlUDWiRrZ0= Received: (from lists@localhost) by cmplx.uk (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 63U8KlU2026204; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:20:47 GMT (envelope-from lists) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:20:47 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Mark Millard Cc: pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] stable/15: new base packages for PAM, zstd Message-ID: References: <700c882a-ae24-403a-a8e0-5ceffed569ae@yahoo.com> <351d3db5-19d0-4652-a44e-b029a8105937@yahoo.com> <23d5deac-c35c-44f0-9469-7a22772dd54c@yahoo.com> <5c69753a-ca42-4796-a63f-fa6883e91ab8@yahoo.com> List-Id: Packaging the FreeBSD base system List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkgbase List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkgbase@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5c69753a-ca42-4796-a63f-fa6883e91ab8@yahoo.com> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:25795, ipnet:185.139.32.0/24, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4g5nDh3y2Lz3xTk X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 11:35:06AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > On 4/29/26 10:51, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 09:32:44AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > >>> > >>> I get this: > >>> > >>> # /home/as/pkgbasify.lua > >>> Error: The system is already using pkgbase. > >>> Pass --force to run pkgbasify anyway, for example to fix a partial conversion. > >>> > >>> I don't remember invoking pkgbasify before. > >>> > >>> should I --force it? > >> > >> Note: I have never used the force option. > >> > >> A basic question that would direct what you should do . . . > >> > >> Which do you want as the basis for your environment: > >> > >> ) pkgbase? > >> > >> ) What you had before (reverting the partial pkgbase install to no > >> longer be registered as pkgbase materials)? > >> > >> You have the choice of which direction to go. > > > > don't mind really... if pkgbase will be the default soon(?) > > then probably I'd like to go ahead rather than back. > > The old way is not being removed until FreeBSD 16.0-RELEASE. So pkgbase > is not required for 15.*-RELEASE at all: both ways will exist. > > 15.0-RELEASE classified pkgbase as a technology preview, as I remember > how it was presented. > > So which? pkgbasify --force did it # freebsd-version -kru 15.0-RELEASE-p7 15.0-RELEASE-p7 15.0-RELEASE-p7 Thank you for all your help and explanations Anton