From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 20 21:05:36 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17C816A41F;
	Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:05:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from clint@0lsen.net)
Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [63.240.76.49])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DAD743D69;
	Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:05:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from clint@0lsen.net)
Received: from 0lsen.net ([24.20.127.157])
	by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP
	id <2005092021053001400k0nsie>; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:05:30 +0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by 0lsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457FC17AF2;
	Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <43307999.9030802@0lsen.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:05:29 -0700
From: Clint Olsen <clint@0lsen.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050904)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pav@FreeBSD.org
References: <20050920204941.GA73621@0lsen.net>
	<1127249597.66767.8.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
In-Reply-To: <1127249597.66767.8.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, mbr@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: devel/fam missing boot (rc.d/fam.sh)?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:05:36 -0000

Thanks for the hint.  However, since this was installed as a 
prerequisite for the GNOME operating system (via portinstall), are we 
supposed to examine every dependent package's pkg-message to find out 
what we missed?

It would seem like you would want it to install it in one form or 
another and allow the user to change it if that's not the preferred 
method.  At least in that case you get a working daemon out of the box. 
  It seems to jive with spirit of the more automated portinstall method.

Thanks,

-Clint

Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Yes, everything.
> 
> cat /usr/ports/devel/fam/pkg-message
>