Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:30:36 +0100
From:      Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
To:        Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc:        Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl>, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: BlackBerry (Re: using libusb)
Message-ID:  <200801111930.37320.hselasky@c2i.net>
In-Reply-To: <200801111323.58302@aldan>
References:  <200801090114.56195@aldan> <200801111910.41509.hselasky@c2i.net> <200801111323.58302@aldan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 11 January 2008, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On =D0'=D1=D4=CE=C9=C3=D1 11 =D3=A6=DE=C5=CE=D8 2008, Hans Petter Selasky=
 wrote:
> =3D /dev/usb<bus_no>.<dev_no>.<iface_no>.<ep_no>
> [...]
> =3D What do you think ?
>
> I still prefer the elegance of /dev/umassX and /dev/ugenY to the
> nameless /dev/usbX.Y.Z
>
> For example, all SCSI devices have names (da, st, cd, pt, etc.), even
> though they are all identified by the SCSI bus number, ID, and LUN.

Hi,

I think you misunderstand. If there is a mass storage device it will appear=
=20
like /dev/da0. If there is a libusb device it will have to use /dev/usbX.Y.=
Z.

=2D-HPS



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200801111930.37320.hselasky>