Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 10 Apr 2016 19:31:29 -0453.75
From:      "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD ports list !!!! <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: 'porting' AMD compiler suite
Message-ID:  <570AEF17.2070604@hiwaay.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOgwaMuotsq%2BWAGmfxhjWHHGpa%2BqXtdSvBUhjSYyMvSA2WzFkg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <570ACDB6.1020703@hiwaay.net> <20160410230338.GB24900@server.rulingia.com> <570ADDBF.1050308@hiwaay.net> <CAOgwaMuotsq%2BWAGmfxhjWHHGpa%2BqXtdSvBUhjSYyMvSA2WzFkg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/10/16 19:05, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:10 PM, William A. Mahaffey III <wam@hiwaay.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>
>>> On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ what seems to
>>>> be a bunch of linuxisms in conditionals to allow compilation for
>>>> different architectures, see attached orig-Makefile.
>>>>
>>> Have you tried using gmake, rather than the base make?
>>>
>>>
>> Hmmmm .... No, I didn't :-/ .... Did I mention pilot error ? I thought the
>> system make was a version of gmake, but apparently not, right ? Thanks,
>> I'll try that & see how it goes ....
>>
>> --
>>
>>          William A. Mahaffey III
>>
>>   ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>          "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
>>           ever devised by man."
>>                             -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
> FreeBSD make and GNU make are different species ( means not compatible ) .
>
>
> If you compare building of GCC in FreeBSD and Linux , you may model
> building of Open64 in FreeBSD with respect to building in Linux .
>
>
> If I were you , I would not work on Open64 because GCC is much better than
> Open64 with respect to my opinion . In Linux , I have checked Open64 for
> using it , but I have abandoned that idea , because at least it does not
> have 128 bit floating point numbers ( if it is not included yet ) .

I have tried GCC & found it wanting, that's why I am looking for an 
alternative ....

>
>
> It may be said that it is abandoned :
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open64
> http://developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/cpu-development/x86-open64-compiler-suite/
>
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/open64/
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/open64/files/open64/
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/open64/files/open64/Open64-5.0/
>
>
> http://www.open64.net/
>
> Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>


I *think* AMD is still plodding along w/ their version, not certain of 
that ....


-- 

	William A. Mahaffey III

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------

	"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
	 ever devised by man."
                            -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?570AEF17.2070604>