From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Nov 14 15:43:26 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA20637
          for ports-outgoing; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 15:43:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA20622
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 15:43:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.2/8.6.9) with ESMTP id PAA08841; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 15:39:52 -0800 (PST)
To: pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [comp.os.linux.announce] xpdf 0.6 - a PDF viewer for X 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 14 Nov 1996 18:21:57 PST."
             <328BD3C5.5CBF@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co> 
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 15:39:52 -0800
Message-ID: <8839.848014792@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Our system administrator asked me, some months ago, what should they
> choose between Linux and FreeBSD for their internet courses. Knowing
> they wanted to hear "Linux" from lips, I told them if they wanted user
> level applications, they should choose Linux, but if they wanted to use
> it for servers and other serious stuff they should prefer FreeBSD.

FWIW, that's basically what I tell people who ask me also.  I say that
if they're looking for primarily a desktop OS and need access to lots
of native apps and/or DOS emulation support, they should probably look
at Linux.  If they want a server or other 24/7 resource, or they need
to do serious networking, FreeBSD is the best choice.  Of course, I
also point out that each can often be used in the other role with some
success but, in terms of overall emphasis, those are my best
recommendations.

					Jordan