Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:03:13 +0100 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, stable@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Message-ID: <86irruao3i.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> (M. Warner Losh's message of "Sat, 04 Feb 2006 08:51:34 -0700 (MST)") References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > As I have repeatedly pointed out in the past, -O2 catches more > > bugs because it enables optimizations which require more extensive > > coverage analysis. > Then it should be the default, standard flag. I wish. Unfortunately, there is a very vocal minority which systematically opposes this kind of change. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86irruao3i.fsf>