From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 16 16:43:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 4FAA2106568D; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097E21065672; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:43:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raj@semihalf.com) Received: from smtp.semihalf.com (smtp.semihalf.com [213.17.239.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBDF8FC0A; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [213.17.239.109]) by smtp.semihalf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B4AC427D; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:45:32 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at semihalf.com Received: from smtp.semihalf.com ([213.17.239.109]) by localhost (smtp.semihalf.com [213.17.239.109]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DCsza7wXYZ2T; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:45:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.0.34] (cardhu.semihalf.com [213.17.239.108]) by smtp.semihalf.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EA14C41E7; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:45:32 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Rafal Jaworowski In-Reply-To: <4B79954D.1060909@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:43:39 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201002151753.o1FHrUEx061091@repoman.freebsd.org> <4B79954D.1060909@freebsd.org> To: Nathan Whitehorn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 174731 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:43:42 -0000 On 2010-02-15, at 19:41, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > Rafal Jaworowski wrote: >> http://p4web.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=3D174731 >>=20 >> Change 174731 by raj@raj_fdt on 2010/02/15 17:53:15 >>=20 >> Refactor and optimize FDT infrastructure. >> =09 >> - Extend 'compatible'-related routines so that we can do strict >> checking i.e. if a node is only compatible with a single = entry. This >> is required for nodes like 'simple-bus' as sometimes other = nodes >> claim their compatibility and we need to have a way to = identify such >> cases. >> =09 > These 'compatible' routines would be very useful in the regular OF = case as well. Any change you could move them into ofw/openfirm? No objections from me; for sure the ofw_ versions can be placed there = (note there are also 'early' versions of these routines, prefixed fdt_, = for cases when OFW i/f is not available yet, and these are ratehr = FDT-specific interest I guess). Rafal