From owner-freebsd-security Fri Apr 17 09:16:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA21115 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 09:16:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA21045; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 16:16:08 GMT (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA11623; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 12:15:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 12:15:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199804171615.MAA11623@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Johan Allard , Robert Watson , Dima Ruban , Matthew Hunt , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel permissions In-Reply-To: <11838.892828664@time.cdrom.com> References: <11838.892828664@time.cdrom.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk < said: >> On the whish list I would like to add support for IPsec. It must be > The WIDE project folks have already implemented both IPsec and > IPv6 - we just need to incorporate their stuff without hopefully > pissing off any of the 1,473 different other IPv6 implementors out > there .: -) If we could just get the WIDE people and the INRIA people (and the NRL people) to all coalesce around a single solution, we'd have a clear winner. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message