From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Jan 22 20:40:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from relay.butya.kz (butya-gw.butya.kz [212.154.129.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F2A37B401; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:40:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by relay.butya.kz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A1D5A288CB; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:40:21 +0600 (ALMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.butya.kz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C0F28872; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:40:21 +0600 (ALMT) Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:40:21 +0600 (ALMT) From: Boris Popov To: Kris Kennaway Cc: "Louis A. Mamakos" , Cameron Grant , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: newpcm/kobj MFC In-Reply-To: <20010122094548.A90200@citusc17.usc.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 08:39:01PM -0500, Louis A. Mamakos wrote: > > > Well, there you go. Is changing an unused API an incompatability? > > I'm not going to make a huge fuss over this, but I think it doesn't > help the cause to get acceptance from vendors if every few months a > maintainer of a part of the tree were to decide to break binary > compatability in an exported API in the -stable branch "just this > once". On other hand, I'm welcome MFCing of kobj. This probably should be done even before 4.1.1... -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message