From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Wed Dec 6 14:41:00 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1E9E81E17 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 14:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@redbarn.org) Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3920474900 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 14:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@redbarn.org) Received: from [192.168.11.48] (200.12.232.153.ap.dti.ne.jp [153.232.12.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A20961FA2; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 14:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5A28017B.7000806@redbarn.org> Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 23:40:59 +0900 From: Paul Vixie User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.20 (Windows/20171012) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More CC: "Patrick M. Hausen" , "Rodney W. Grimes" , FreeBSD virtualization Subject: Re: NFS alternatives References: <201712051641.vB5GfR5I052310@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> <4A321A55-23FA-42AB-BF65-3DCA3464307D@punkt.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 14:41:00 -0000 Adam Vande More wrote: ... > Like this? > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-ggate.html yes, that'd be fine. if i used NFS i'd have to run lockd. -- P Vixie