Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Feb 2000 19:53:03 -0600
From:      David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>
To:        "'FreeBSD Questions mailing list'" <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Cobalt RaQ 
Message-ID:  <200002260153.TAA62877@nospam.hiwaay.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from "Koster, K.J." <K.J.Koster@kpn.com>  of "Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:08:42 %2B0100." <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522013138B6@l04.research.kpn.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Koster, K.J." writes:
> > 
> > Aren't they based on a RISC processor? I didn't think they were 
> > x86-based. That would make it, um, sort of difficult.
> > 
> Well, couldn't NetBSD be a good starting point then? I don't know much about
> them, but I like thier logo. :)

The early RaQ's were MIPS based. New ones are x86.

--
David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net
=====================================================================
The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its
capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200002260153.TAA62877>