Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 19:11:00 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> To: kris@obsecurity.org (Kris Kennaway) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, ru@FreeBSD.ORG (Ruslan Ermilov) Subject: Re: 'make includes' ownership patch Message-ID: <200105290211.TAA58313@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <20010528141300.B54500@xor.obsecurity.org> from Kris Kennaway at "May 28, 2001 02:13:01 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:31:58AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > > This was on my TODO. The only problem with INCOWN/INCGRP not being
> > > > > used here is that they were introduced long after include/Makefile.
> > > >
> > > > And perhaps one should go read the commit message that introduced them...
> > > > it was an experiment, a sample test designed to only be used in -current
> > > > /usr/src/lib, that BDE, Sheldon and myself had long followon conversations
> > > > about, and got dropped into the cracks.
> > >
> > > What was the reasoning for a serperate owner specification from BIN*?
> >
> > Simple orthagonality. Ie, each bsd.*.mk file typically has a seperate
> > set of *{DIR/OWN/GRP/MODE} specs. bsd.inc.mk was cloned from another
> > bsd.*.mk file.
>
> Well, I don't mind how it gets fixed, but it's very unorthogonal at
> the moment having to set two sets of OWN/GRP variables in order to
> make includes as non-root.
>
> Someone tell me what they should be using and I'll fix it.
Change bsd.own.mk to:
INCOWN?= ${BINOWN}
INCGRP?= ${BINGRP}
INCMODE?= ${NOBINMODE}
as a temporary hack until INC* and bsd.inc.mk is completed/gutted/replaced/
whatever.
--
Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105290211.TAA58313>