From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 29 11:45:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E4FC5DA for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB9C4138E for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgin8 with SMTP id n8so25192197wgi.0 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 04:45:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=2Z4Bb+WzbWqC1BGiPYZzJDduS5IxZKQljcFey4CrMd4=; b=Z+wiC+lGhcjEOVgsNY8pIP+VuBBLRngCfp++7GldyuoopxY9Zfpudiamd8jts/GQwg ZcJ29hO91dlnbivtw2IO00kIpmENQBs49SC8Vc99V6UKd3nyZwJYlr81QY0XDQdGxEsJ HwqvR/tXM3VD4kfjsbTM2GIF1ORt409oBH56XrQ3AiMd3pG7Ye6m8jKT89Aw6PipEScD 7DXnUxotSmXJzgeWBIOVbZcrpx5kB5ssvja7/aDMHl+V3X2NjxaYz6a2IqC/KoxYy4NF sbORrzwzP82kPmAMHyUsKYHWwZgKhZRrbs34le223tqge4VXi0jLL8L2Hw4KRS5qyd6T m2ZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlyDjP8H5DSMKWFf8+VYUqGEPQ41j9yROx9b10P52Hbs2NKVhs2AmcbkAK0Q/5OQARMKid8 X-Received: by 10.194.89.70 with SMTP id bm6mr39443899wjb.146.1430307910804; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 04:45:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com. [209.85.212.179]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wr2sm38674578wjb.45.2015.04.29.04.45.09 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 04:45:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so62492234wid.0 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 04:45:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.185.167 with SMTP id fd7mr14235960wjc.32.1430307909731; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 04:45:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.70.129 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 04:44:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150429110304.GA3377@brick.home> References: <20150429110304.GA3377@brick.home> From: Jov Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 19:44:49 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Enabling RACCT/RCTL in GENERIC. To: freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:45:19 -0000 =E2=80=8BIt's great,please do it=E2=80=8B. Jov blog: http:amutu.com/blog 2015-04-29 19:03 GMT+08:00 Edward Tomasz Napiera=C5=82a = : > Hi. With the patch I've just committed, the cost of compiling with RACCT > and RCTL is just a subroutine call and an unlocked variable check, in a f= ew > places. I'd like to add "options RACCT", "options RCTL", and "options > RACCT_DISABLED", to GENERIC on amd64, and MFC it before 10.2. What do yo= u > think? Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " >