From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 12 20:25:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E546016A4D0; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:25:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458BB43D49; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:25:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iACKPLux032242; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:25:22 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:25:31 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20041112.132531.87764635.imp@bsdimp.com> To: wb@freebie.xs4all.nl From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20041112200844.GA31309@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20041112195030.GA63153@ns1.xcllnt.net> <12448.1100289673@critter.freebsd.dk> <20041112200844.GA31309@freebie.xs4all.nl> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: phk@phk.freebsd.dk cc: harti@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org cc: marcel@xcllnt.net Subject: Re: [TEST] make -j patch [take 2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:25:42 -0000 In message: <20041112200844.GA31309@freebie.xs4all.nl> Wilko Bulte writes: : On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 09:01:13PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote.. : > In message <20041112195030.GA63153@ns1.xcllnt.net>, Marcel Moolenaar writes: : > >On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 08:57:21PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: : > >> : > >> I now feel like everything that should have been said : > >> was said, and this thread should die. ;) : > > : > >Not quite. It hasn't been said that phk@ is obstinate, disrespectful : > >and arrogant. For someone who's advocating mechanisms over policies : > >he's also been trying very hard to shove his policies down your : > >throat. This also makes him promiscuous (in a non-sexual manner). : > : > Uhm, it's actually me who is trying to prevent Ruslan for enforcing : > his policies on the "make universe" target... : : Gentlemen... Agreed. BOTH parties are suggesting a policy here. This is a case where we can't just have tools, not rules. We have to decide on which policy to use. Personal attacks are not useful in making that decision, and further such attacks will not be tolerated. Warner