Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 09:01:47 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= <bjoern.koenig@alpha-tierchen.de> To: jgrosch@MooseRiver.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVS tags Message-ID: <1158.89.247.46.141.1178521307.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> In-Reply-To: <20070507052955.GB1408@mooseriver.com> References: <20070507052955.GB1408@mooseriver.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > I have been spending a lot of time building machines at work. Our > engineers want to have the machine in question to have a specific > version of FreeBSD, ie. FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p11 for example. I have > noticed that there is not a CVS tag for this in the tree. Is there > a specific reason why we do not tag the tree for the patch levels? Although it should never be necessary to use -p11 explicitely, you can get it if you use RELENG_4_11 and the date 2005/06/30 00:00:00 for example. The appropriate line in your supfile looks like this: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4_11 date=2005.06.30.00.00.00 The file src/sys/conf/newvers.sh contains the version number. You can determine the date in the CVS repository. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh?f=u&only_with_tag=RELENG_4_11&logsort=date Regards Björn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1158.89.247.46.141.1178521307.squirrel>