From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 10 19:30:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA0C804 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 19:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2BE2B7 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 19:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r4AJU1Fx005673 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 19:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r4AJU1jB005672; Fri, 10 May 2013 19:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 19:30:01 GMT Message-Id: <201305101930.r4AJU1jB005672@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: kern/122838: [devfs] devfs doesn't handle complex paths (like zvol/pool/vms) good X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexander Leidinger List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 19:30:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/122838; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexander Leidinger To: jh@FreeBSD.org, avg@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org,amdmi3@amdmi3.ru Cc: Subject: Re: kern/122838: [devfs] devfs doesn't handle complex paths (like zvol/pool/vms) good Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 21:26:03 +0200 Hi, I've go hit by this behavior of the devfs rule matching and I fully agree to the rationale of Andriy. Can we please agree on going ahead with this? Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137