From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 25 14:52:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAB197C5 for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 14:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5300::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.smtp.rzone.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A4DE178C for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 14:52:31 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :JiIXek6mfvEEUpFQdo7Fj1/zg48CFjWjQv0cW+St/nW/auYssS93kCQ1uZfxmQ== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from britannica.bec.de (ip-2-202-70-200.web.vodafone.de [2.202.70.200]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 37.5 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id i066cfr3PEpo6Bq (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 16:51:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by britannica.bec.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 25 Apr 2015 16:51:49 +0200 Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 16:51:49 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r281959 - head/usr.bin/whois Message-ID: <20150425145149.GB25518@britannica.bec.de> References: <201504250051.t3P0pitf037355@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201504250051.t3P0pitf037355@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 14:52:31 -0000 On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:51:44AM +0000, Xin LI wrote: > Attempt to connect to alternate addresses if the connect doesn't > succeed in 180ms, and cut wait time between connection attempts > in half for each additional, if no connection was established. 180ms is very short. I have such latency over 2G, 3G and 4G most of the time, soo wouldn't this make whois pretty much useless on such connections? Joerg