Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:10:08 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which GSSAPI library does FreeBSD use? Message-ID: <86ej5c681b.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0807291020260.12515@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca> (Rick Macklem's message of "Tue\, 29 Jul 2008 10\:27\:58 -0400 \(EDT\)") References: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0807161832470.5025@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca> <86myk06e18.fsf@ds4.des.no> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0807291020260.12515@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> writes: > [...] It looks like [FreeBSD's libgssapi] inherited the heimdal-0.6 > bug, which ignores the lack of the GSS_C_SEQUENCE_FLAG and checks it > even if it wasn't specified. This breaks the client side of > RPCSEC_GSS, since somewhat out-of-order Sun RPCs, is normal. > (RPCSEC_GSS uses a window of recent seq#s to protect against replay > attempts.) > > Should I email Doug or submit a bug report, to see if someone is willing > to work on fixing this? You should contact Doug directly. I wonder what this has to do with filesystems, though... DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ej5c681b.fsf>