From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 16:01:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CF616A41F; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:01:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C3843D45; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:01:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j77G18IM081390; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:01:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 10:02:11 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20050807.100211.20316746.imp@bsdimp.com> To: hrs@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20050807.211240.75793221.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <20050807.153425.21897310.hrs@allbsd.org> <42F5BC19.5040602@freebsd.org> <20050807.211240.75793221.hrs@allbsd.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 07 Aug 2005 10:01:09 -0600 (MDT) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 12:01:56 +0000 Cc: dougb@freebsd.org, cperciva@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:01:55 -0000 In message: <20050807.211240.75793221.hrs@allbsd.org> Hiroki Sato writes: : So, I would like the server-side bits to be imported if portsnap will : be in the base system. I wouldn't dream of having a local system without a cvsup mirror daemon running on it, even if I don't let others use it. I suspect that as disk gets cheaper, doing the same for the ports snapshots might be viable. People used to complain about how much disk space the cvs tree took up, but with 400G drives, those complaints are gone. However, one possible gotcha in setting this up is licensing. Do you know that your distribution of binary snapshot complies with the GPL which requires that you also provide the sources when you do this? The project already has some issues with GPLd ports when it builds binaries. Are distfiles part of portsnap? If so, then you are safe for the standard licenses... Warner