From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 25 23: 0:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B133C37B7E6 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 23:00:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (doug@master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA44447; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 23:00:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <390685E7.986C2EBA@gorean.org> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 23:00:07 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT-0422 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anatoly Vorobey Cc: Mikko T , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: commit MAKE_SHELL? References: ; <20000425170951.A29390@happy.checkpoint.com> <200004251528.RAA29727@m2.dynas.se> <20000425232447.A32567@happy.checkpoint.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anatoly Vorobey wrote: > Well, *should* we have a built-in "test"? I gather the original ash didn't > have it due to the KIS principle. But if it speeds things up considerably, > it's not much of a bloat, is it? I'd volunteer to write it. Unfortunately, the only way to tell for sure would be to do a couple make worlds with the current sh, then do some with super-sh with the built in 'test'. Doug -- Excess on occasion is exhilarating. It prevents moderation from acquiring the deadening effect of a habit. -- W. Somerset Maugham To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message