From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org Fri May 4 20:55:08 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D1DFB7BE5 for ; Fri, 4 May 2018 20:55:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [IPv6:2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F76D8494E for ; Fri, 4 May 2018 20:55:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from localhost by mail.inka.de with local-rmail id 1fEhjN-0001mq-Ru; Fri, 04 May 2018 22:55:05 +0200 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w44KoDHE027085 for ; Fri, 4 May 2018 22:50:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from news@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from news@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w44KoDNT027084 for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Fri, 4 May 2018 22:50:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from news) To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org From: Christian Weisgerber Newsgroups: list.freebsd.security Subject: Re: Spectre-NG - Multiple new Intel CPU flaws Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 20:50:13 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <6e279745-bfe5-fad1-a1aa-3b4d0356d55d@quip.cz> <65084.1525462048@segfault.tristatelogic.com> User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 20:55:08 -0000 On 2018-05-04, "Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote: >>https://www.heise.de/ct/artikel/Exclusive-Spectre-NG-Multiple-new-Intel-CPU-flaws-revealed-several-serious-4040648.html > > I suspect that I speak for almost everyone here when I say that > I really hope like hell that the story at the above link is > just some sort of a colossal gag or prank. c't magazine is one of the most reputable sources in the IT press. I have no doubt that there are eight processor vulnerabilities under embargo. What there actual impact may be remains to be seen. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de