Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 05:58:07 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beat_G=E4tzi?= <beat@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris <skvortsov42@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What about Firefox 11? Message-ID: <F0BB5BD2-889E-484A-9381-766AB62E47FA@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BZnuqzbApQE2jvHBGUUMCcmoz2dO2ArCUS9eddrws8N7Lpi%2BQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <m32s39-3l4.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <4F6B5A9F.1070006@freebsd.org> <20120322194736.196f72e7@scorpio> <CA%2BZnuqzbApQE2jvHBGUUMCcmoz2dO2ArCUS9eddrws8N7Lpi%2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 25, 2012, at 1:43 AM, Chris wrote: > On 3/22/12, Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net> wrote: >> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:00:15 +0100 >> Florian Smeets articulated: >> >>> Yes, after the ports freeze. We decided to stay with firefox 10.0.x >>> for now and update www/firefox to 11 after the FreeBSD 8.3 release is >>> out. >> >> Considering that Firefox is in a race to get to version 20 before the >> Mayan Doomsday December 21, I think you should revise that to at least >> Firefox 12 or better. > > Is there any chance of the 10-ESR release being turned into its own > port? Yes, there is: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/165790 HTH, Beat
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F0BB5BD2-889E-484A-9381-766AB62E47FA>