From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Mar 5 01:20:18 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA04408 for isp-outgoing; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 01:20:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns.extech.msk.su (ns.extech.msk.su [193.124.244.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA04342 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 01:20:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from Shine.extech.msk.su (shine.extech.msk.su [193.124.244.35]) by ns.extech.msk.su (8.8.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA15660; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 12:19:09 +0300 (MSK) Message-Id: <199703050919.MAA15660@ns.extech.msk.su> From: "Vnotchenko S.S." To: "Adrian Gonzalez" , "Yuri Gindin" Cc: Subject: Re: Re: [H] Optimal computer for FreeBSD Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 12:19:08 +0300 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk ---------- > From: Adrian Gonzalez > To: Yuri Gindin > Cc: Vnotchenko S.S. ; freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: Re: [H] Optimal computer for FreeBSD > Date: среда 5 марта 1997 1:58 > > > > On Mon, 3 Mar 1997, Yuri Gindin wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Feb 1997, Vnotchenko S.S. wrote: > > > > > answers and choosen following configuration for ours main host: > > > --- > > > CPU: PPRO 200Mhz, 256K cache > > > MB: ASUSTEK P65UP5 > > > RAM: 64 Mb EDO RAM > > > SCSI HA: Adaptec 2940UW > > I'd recommend Adaptec 3940 UW (two channels) > > > SCSI HDD: 4x2GB Seagate barracuda > > Fujitsu Ultra SCSI, I think is better then Seagate > > > SCSI CD-ROM: 8x NEC SCSI > > > Ethernet: 3c595 > > This cards are discontinued by 3com. I also had problems with > > early revision of these cards, use 3c905 XL > > --Yuri. > > I just installed freebsd 2.1.7 on a pentium machine with 2 3com 3c900 > Etherlink XL PCI cards (I believe the 3c59x were dicontinued in favor of > the 3c90x). Needles to say, It worked like a charm :) > Hmmm... I see NO mention about 3c9XX cards in HARDWARE.TXT, RELNOTES.TXT nor /sys/i386/conf/LINT...So, DOES it supported in 2.1.7R or NOT? If, yes, what is kernel's options for it? > regards > > -Adrian Thanks, Sergey.