From owner-freebsd-net Mon Feb 5 22:27:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from urban.iinet.net.au (urban.iinet.net.au [203.59.24.231]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663FF37B4EC; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 22:27:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from muzak.iinet.net.au (muzak.iinet.net.au [203.59.24.237]) by urban.iinet.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA10431; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:27:00 +0800 Received: from elischer.org (reggae-03-98.nv.iinet.net.au [203.59.78.98]) by muzak.iinet.net.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA22815; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:24:30 +0800 Message-ID: <3A7F8AFC.9BA79F4B@elischer.org> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 21:26:20 -0800 From: Julian Elischer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Bihan-Faou Cc: Luigi Rizzo , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, richw@webcom.com, julian@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BRIDGE breaks ARP? (more info) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote: > > Hi again, > > Maybe I am misunderstanding things, but since the arp-request we recieve are > for our IP address, do we need to forward them to the other segments ? > > Here is my setup: > > [PC : 192.168.1.254]--------[rl0]---[FreeBSD : 192.168.1.1]---[fxp0]----[] > > On the freebsd machine I have 2 tcpdumps running looking for arps on each > interface. > > Now if I do a "ping 192.168.1.254", I get a > "arp who-as 192.168.1.1 tell 192.168.1.254" line on both tcpdumps. The > arp-reply goes out only on rl0 (this seem correct). > > Patrick. this is correct and expected.. -- __--_|\ Julian Elischer / \ julian@elischer.org ( OZ ) World tour 2000-2001 ---> X_.---._/ v To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message