From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 15:19:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E70816A429; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:19:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B9543D1F; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:18:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0FE1F030; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:18:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id 4A4016126; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:18:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:18:54 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim To: Eirik =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8verby?= Message-ID: <20050620151854.GA41619@stack.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: NFS-related hang in 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:19:00 -0000 --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:53:19AM +0200, Eirik verby wrote: > I know enough not to call this a "confirmation", but disabling =20 > dummynet did indeed allow me to finish the backup. I never made it =20 > past 15GBs before, now the full 19GB tar.gz file is done, and the =20 > boxes are both still running. The funny thing is - I only disabled =20 > dummynet on one of the boxes now - the source of the backup, the box =20 > that pushes data. The other box has pretty much 100% the same setup, =20 > and is also i386. But as traffic shaping can only happen on outgoing =20 > packets, I suppose that makes sense. Hmm, does that solve kern/79208 for you as well by any chance ? Marc --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCtt5eezjnobFOgrERAsXHAJ9pk5mS42whT7zVcNDfmrI6AnWncACfcKHv jfOmVW0LKbz9WW1b/2qh0f4= =sXsW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--