Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:23:40 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Olli Hauer <ohauer@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r303982 - head/www/apache22 Message-ID: <CADLo83_W90DBGs7OXkdwXGX1zT1J365%2Bq2CQCNEYw2nQomEW3w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CACM2dAbyDNgqVxHSV7G=FCv6Egay9F8hM2km67g7OE4RUke4Og@mail.gmail.com> References: <201209091701.q89H1UNl009740@svn.freebsd.org> <CACM2dAbyDNgqVxHSV7G=FCv6Egay9F8hM2km67g7OE4RUke4Og@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13 September 2012 02:46, Philip M. Gollucci <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> wrote: > I don't know about this one. Why should apache ports specifically point you > at the wiki. The port system as a whole should do this, or every port > should (that would be a waste) > Please think about this some more. Normally I agree, and I think that general solutions are better. However, in this case, it's one of those very rare occasions that the WITH_ variables don't work correctly. The compatibility layer is good, but with something as complex as the Apache ports it apparently hasn't passed Olli's tests. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83_W90DBGs7OXkdwXGX1zT1J365%2Bq2CQCNEYw2nQomEW3w>