From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jul 13 10:25:32 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA29550 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 13 Jul 1997 10:25:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from circe.bonn-online.com (root@circe.bonn-online.com [195.52.214.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA29544 for ; Sun, 13 Jul 1997 10:25:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rain (portC6.bonn-online.com [195.52.214.77]) by circe.bonn-online.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA29973; Sun, 13 Jul 1997 19:25:08 +0200 Message-ID: <33C90F7A.41C67EA6@bonn-online.com> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 19:25:14 +0200 From: Sebastian Lederer X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-961014-SNAP i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joerg Wunsch CC: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/init.d/ References: <19970711093543.62687@tversu.ac.ru> <19970711084614.RJ19398@uriah.heep.sax.de> <33C5EFC1.41C67EA6@bonn-online.com> <19970711211440.BV38545@uriah.heep.sax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk J Wunsch wrote: > > If you're NFS-exporting your /usr/local, you are basically expected to > care for /usr/local/etc yourself. Typically, this would be a symlink > to /etc/local/ then. There's quite more in /usr/local/etc that will > make it machine-specific, like various configuration files. > > This should probably be mentioned somewhere. > But /usr/local is *very* likely to be NFS-exported in a NIS/NFS-server environment. So it should not be used for host specific data anyway. You suggest this yourself, to use /etc/local instead of /usr/local/etc. What would be the disadvantages if we used /etc/local by default (on machines in an nfs-less environment) ? -- Sebastian Lederer lederer@bonn-online.com