Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 08:10:33 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, anderson@cs.duke.edu Subject: Re: The if_detach problem Message-ID: <14423.37474.771869.241460@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <199912150632.XAA58638@harmony.village.org> References: <14423.3759.258444.555708@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <imp@village.org> <199912142145.VAA34161@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> <19991214160454.26093@right.PCS> <199912150632.XAA58638@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh writes: > In message <14423.3759.258444.555708@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Andrew Gallatin writes: > : s = splnet(); > : /* > : * Close down routes etc. > : * This needs to be at splnet > : */ <...> > > Any reason not to fold this into if_detach until something more > generic could be developed? I like it better than the current > solution chceked in recently... I'm certainly in favor of it. If you do commit it, please give credit in the commit message to the original author who I obtained it from -- Darrell Anderson <anderson@cs.duke.edu> Cheers, Drew ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Andrew Gallatin, Sr Systems Programmer http://www.cs.duke.edu/~gallatin Duke University Email: gallatin@cs.duke.edu Department of Computer Science Phone: (919) 660-6590 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14423.37474.771869.241460>