From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Sep 5 20:59:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E87237B400; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:59:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-88.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53F343E42; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:59:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 77CCC66E01; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:59:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:59:26 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Igor Roshchin Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mutt Message-ID: <20020906035926.GB60748@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20020904222246.GB25549@dragon.nuxi.com> <200209042339.g84NdI822254@giganda.komkon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NMuMz9nt05w80d4+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200209042339.g84NdI822254@giganda.komkon.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 07:39:18PM -0400, Igor Roshchin wrote: > > What revision of /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk do you have? >=20 > I tried to use two revisions: > # $FreeBSD: ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk,v 1.365 2001/04/16 10:28:15 asami Exp $ > which I believe was the original one (from the 4.3-RELEASE) > and another one > # $FreeBSD: ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk,v 1.400 2002/02/24 16:54:34 ache Exp $ > that I downloaded at some point when the port system changed its > behaviour with the dependencies version/revision numbering, > and ports stopped building their dependencies correctly with the original > bsd.port.mk file. >=20 > Both were complaining about -e=20 The ports collection will not work if you mix and match out-of-date pieces together. Upgrade your entire ports collection and it should work fine. > Again (not a rant, but just a dream :-) ), > it would've been nice if the port-making subsystem upgrades > were not abandoned after 4.2 ... I'm not sure what you mean here. Kris --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9eCgdWry0BWjoQKURAmaKAJ95EvG+/JMFE7NQkM2Ctx8B7iO03gCg9II5 +UwjNh1MEbtv20HwZ94kynw= =mE1B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message