From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:27:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640F416A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:27:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.uu.se [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329E243D2D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:27:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 4962448B5; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:27:13 +0100 (MEZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s3924; Wed, 5 Jan 05 21:27:08 +0100 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2ACB4896; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:27:07 +0100 (MEZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id CA3D838015; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:27:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F995C002; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:27:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:27:07 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Davour To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20050105201800.GA29099@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: References: <20050105201800.GA29099@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is bpf a part of IPFW, or am I confused? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:27:15 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:09:55PM +0100, Andreas Davour wrote: >> >> I started to do some research for a kernel compile that should migrate >> my system into the future I came upon the line "options bpf" in the >> kernel config file. >> >> I have searched the handbook and the manpages and not really understood >> the role of bpf. Is it supposed to be enabled when I use IPFW or is it >> another beast altogether, best left undisturbed? > > It's completely separate. OK, good to know. It wasn't all together clear from the documentation. /andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?