From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 15 19:15:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F83216A41C for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:15:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D4C43D53 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:15:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBCD5D27; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:15:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37480-04; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:15:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-54-113.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.54.113]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5F35C69; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:15:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42D80B5D.6060107@mac.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:15:41 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" References: <38171.1121430073@thrush.ravenbrook.com> <42D7EBDE.8030807@mac.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: Nick Barnes , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: better disk reliability on a desktop machine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:15:49 -0000 Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > On Jul 15, 2005, at 11:01 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote: [ ... ] >> Hard drives provide near-online backup, but only a single full >> iteration. You can do incrementals to DVD or CD-RW or tape, and keep >> many iterations handy, which is far more reliable. > > If you use dump/restore you can do iterative backups to a spare HD as > well... Sure. But a single spare HD is a single point of failure. Having one tape per week or per month going back 10 or 100 tapes gives much more redundancy.... -- -Chuck